<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV class=RTE><BR>i doubt about ruleset in mastershaper demo about<BR>why use hfsc at leaf class but inner class use htb???<BR>how different for manage traffic like it????</DIV>
<DIV class=RTE> </DIV>
<DIV class=RTE>/bin/false qdisc add dev eth1 handle 1: root htb default 1<BR>/bin/false class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 2048Kbit</DIV>
<DIV class=RTE>######### Incoming Rules</DIV>
<DIV class=RTE>######### chain HB<BR>/bin/false class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:21 htb rate 128Kbit ceil 512Kbit prio 2 quantum 1532<BR>######### generating pipes for HB<BR>/bin/false class add dev eth1 parent 1:21 classid 1:299 htb rate 256Kbit ceil 256Kbit prio 4 quantum 1532<BR>/bin/false qdisc add dev eth1 handle 299: parent 1:299 hfsc</DIV>
<DIV class=RTE> </DIV>
<DIV class=RTE>from above command, Is it true i think ...???<BR>use HTB only for shaper bandwidth in each sevice with setting parameter rate???<BR>use HFSC only for manage dequeue traffic after shaper bandwidth from inner class???</DIV>
<DIV class=RTE>How different to use 2 algorithm????</DIV>
<DIV class=RTE> </DIV>
<DIV class=RTE>thankyou</DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! <a href="http://g.msn.com/8HMAEN/2740??PS=47575" target="_top">MSN Messenger</a> Download today it's FREE!</html>