[LARTC] Kernel Packet Traveling Diagram

[nano bug]

Hello,

Can you post the scripts you are using ?

On 7/2/07, Edouard Thuleau <thuleau at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks,
> I know the older version of this diagram and this one is quite the same I
> told below but the problem is the same for the DNAT. I made another test. I
> change the DSCP value in the PREROUTING table and I put an ingress policing
> which match this new dscp value but the filter doesn't match nothing (I work
> on a Linux 2.6.17).
> With my test, the older version (http://www.imagestream.com/~josh/PacketFlow.jpg<http://www.imagestream.com/%7Ejosh/PacketFlow.jpg>)
> of the diagram seams more exactly.
>
> Have you an idea ?
>
> 2007/7/2, nano bug <linnewbye at gmail.com >:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I find this one more useful :
> >
> > http://www.imagestream.com/~josh/PacketFlow-new.png<http://www.imagestream.com/%7Ejosh/PacketFlow-new.png>
> >
> > On 7/2/07, Edouard Thuleau <thuleau at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >  Hi,
> > >
> > > I find this diagram which details the kernel packet traveling :
> > > http://www.docum.org/docum.org/kptd/
> > > Is it up to date ?
> > > I made some test and I put a DNAT rules in the PREROUTING table of an
> > > interface and I attach it a ingress policy, the dst IP wasn't changed. the
> > > DNAT it isn't yet make.
> > >
> > > I've another question (I'm not sure is it the good mailing list), for
> > > the fragment packet, I see the ingress policy doesn't work correctly and I'd
> > > like to know where in the kernel travel of the packet the fragment are
> > > re-assemble ? At the NAT or in the routing ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Edouard.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > LARTC mailing list
> > > LARTC at mailman.ds9a.nl
> > > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
> > >
> > >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/attachments/20070702/516cea42/attachment.htm