[LARTC] Load Balancing Problems

[Kuolung]

Hi ,

Are U test it for same remote site and same client ??

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alan Romaniuc" <alan.romaniuc at inteligensa.com.br>
To: <lartc at mailman.ds9a.nl>
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 6:42 AM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Load Balancing Problems


>
> Hi all,
>
> After setting the CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED to no and apply patches 
> from  http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#routes , everything is working fine. No more 
> problems with the two uplinks and one route only.
>
> Thanks for the help... I've been fighting with that for one week....
>
> I will point this solution in another places too.
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Alan
>
>
>
>
> Luciano Ruete escreveu:
>> On Friday 05 January 2007 08:33, Alan Romaniuc wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a router that got its second link. I was trying to do load
>>> balancing, but i can not get it to work properly.
>>>
>>> Just one link works at time, and is always the second in the command ip
>>> route add default table 222 proto static.
>>>
>>> Am I missing something? My script is below. I am using Debian, tried
>>> with kernel 2.6.19 (my compilation) or debian's  one (2.6.18-3-486),
>>> same results
>>>
>>
>> Try "your compilation" without CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED
>>
>> there are several threads on this topic in the archive, one as reference:
>> http://archives.free.net.ph/message/20060618.150532.8a6cc07f.en.html
>>
>> If it solves the problem, maybe is time to contact the author of 
>> Multipath Cached and send some report.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list
> LARTC at mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean. 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.