[LARTC] Class C network 223.255.255.x

[Erik Slagter]

On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 14:52 +0200, the sew wrote:
> Most networks are using either 10.x.x.x or 172.x.x.x or 192.168.x.x ,
> but was curious If I can use the range 223.255.255.x for my backbone
> routing, this looks like a nice block to use as most ppl don't use
> this, specially if you build quite a big intranet
> 
> what about the whole 223.x.x.x block, will this be used on the
> internet?

These are valid routable ip adresses, so you'd better not use them for
your own purposes.

What is wrong with the official private ranges?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 2771 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/attachments/20060412/f1bb4220/smime.bin