[LARTC] ip route doesn't not work with virtual inferfaces

[Radek Vokál]

I have two IP for eth0 which correspond to eth0 and eth0:1
I want to create a route 
to 192.168.66.0/24 via 192.168.0.50 from eth0:1 

so I add the route with

ip route add 192.168.66.0/24 via 192.168.1.2   dev eth0:1

but when I connect to 192.168.66.0/24 network in connects still using
the IP of eth0, not the IP of eth0:1 as one would expect.

What's strange to me is that ip route list dev eth0:1 shows same output
as ip route list dev eth0

is this expected behavior or is there a bug? 

Radek


-- 
Radek Vokál <rvokal at redhat.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/attachments/20051205/4f204d81/attachment.pgp