[LARTC] Shaping traffic on heavily oversubscribed links?
Andy Furniss
andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com
Sun, 02 Jan 2005 01:07:28 +0000
Dimitris Kotsonis wrote:
> Justin Schoeman wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am having some fun with traffic shaping, and have run into an
>> interesting situation. Here is South Africa, most internet links are
>> heavily oversubscribed, which means that in most cases the local link
>> is _not_ the bottleneck, and shaping on the local link does not help
>> that much...
>>
>
> We have the same problem in DSL lines here in Greece.
>
> I have found that while the average efective speed on such lines varies,
> tha average rate of packets is more or less constant. I have a theory
> for this. I believe that the routers that forward the traffic on
> congested lines - on ISPs and on the ATM circuits at the telcoms - don't
> take the extra time needed to calculate the size of the packets and
> distribute the traffic on a per packet basis. This leads to a 'fairness'
> among the end receivers based on packets/sec instead of bandwidth.
>
> To be more specific. In my ADSL line I usually achieve between 20-30 pps
> (measured with MRTG). With an average packet size of 1500 this is 20-45
> kbytes/sec. But packets sizes close to the MTU are found on single
> ftp/http connections and pretty much nowehere else. Packet sizes of 400
> to 500 are more realistic, especially when p2p programs are involved.
> 20-30 packets give 8-10kbytes/sec. You can expect even less when using
> voip programs which utilize smaller packets.
>
> If you find that single a FTP session tends to get more bandwidth thatn
> p2p programs or multiuser traffic then you have a simillar problem to
> our own. I would suggest that you setup MRTG to monitor packets to
> research further into this.
It is normal for an FTP download to take over from p2ps the latter are
likely to be higher latency, so TCP will let a lower latency FTP grab
more bandwidth.
Try shaping with HTB and sfq - It should help.
>
>
>
>> Does anybody have some tips on shaping such links? How can you get
>> interractive traffic if you don't know how much bandwidth to reserve
>> for it? How can you give fair access to a link if you don't know what
>> the link capacity is?
>>
>
> Well, I am working on one. Since I can't shape bandwidth because it
> flactuates erratically with time and usage I decided to shape packets. I
> have created a new queueing discipline based on TBF which uses packets
> instead of bytes for its tokens and I am allocating a constant
> packet/sec rate on each user of my ADSL line. A better solution would be
> to create an HTB alike packet-based qdisc for dynamic shaping.
>
> If you find that you have the some problem as me and you want to
> experiment with a packet-based TBF qdisc I can send you a patch for
> linux-2.6.8 and iproute2 in this list.
>
> I would like to here your thought on this anyway ...
>
> Dimitris
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>