[LARTC] Performance difference with HTB patch in 2.4.14 and without patch in 2.4.20

Aravind babu aravindforn@yahoo.co.in
Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:52:28 +0100 (BST)


--0-433042606-1089651148=:5693
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi,
 
   I am using linux 2.4.14 box for my bandwidth management.I patched the kernel for HTB support.I think HTB comes by default with 2.4.20.My doubt is 
 
"Is there any performance difference between patched kernel i.e. 2.4.14  and unpatched kernel 2.4.20 with respect to bandwidth management ?"
 
Thanks in advance,
Aravind.


Yahoo! India Careers: Over 50,000 jobsonline.
--0-433042606-1089651148=:5693
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<DIV>
<DIV>Hi,</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;&nbsp; I am using linux 2.4.14 box for my bandwidth management.I patched the kernel for HTB support.I think HTB comes by default with 2.4.20.My doubt is </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>"Is there any performance&nbsp;difference between patched&nbsp;kernel i.e.&nbsp;2.4.14 &nbsp;and unpatched kernel 2.4.20 with respect to bandwidth management ?"</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Thanks in advance,</DIV>
<DIV>Aravind.</DIV></DIV><p><font face=arial size=-1>
<a href="http://in.rd.yahoo.com/specials/mailtg/*http://yahoo.naukri.com/" target="_blank">
<b>Yahoo! India Careers</a>:</b> Over 50,000 jobs
<a href="http://in.rd.yahoo.com/specials/mailtg2/*http://yahoo.naukri.com/" target="_blank">online</a>.</font>
--0-433042606-1089651148=:5693--