[LARTC] Can anyone fix this?

[Dmitry Golubev]

Hello, 

What do you mean by direct queue? If I do not have any filter rules for a 
packet, I thought it would not be limited at all...

Best regards,
Dmitry Golubev

On Sunday 23 May 2004 19:37, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote:
> Dmitry Golubev wrote:
> > Quote from LATRC: Also, with HTB, you should attach all filters to the
> > root!
>
> Then LARTC is wrong. HTB first tries to classify by priority,
> if that fails it follows the filter chain from the root until
> it hits a leaf-class, if that fails it tries if the default
> class is a leaf-class, if even that fails it uses the direct
> queue. BTW, HFSC does it the same way, but there is no direct
> queue, so unclassified packets are just dropped.
>
> Regards
> Patrick
>
> > Dmitry
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/