[LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?

[Lawrence MacIntyre]

--=-jX/ixBOU2tlP47rnNhoX
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I've used HTB and CBQ to protect MPEG2 traffic streams from UDP traffic
over 100 Mb/s interfaces.  I have not yet attempted this with 1000 Mb/s
interfaces, but I hope to get to that this year (it it much more
difficult to measure accurately at this speed).

On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 09:49, Anton Yurchenko wrote:
> Hello,
>=20
> I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems.=20
> Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC=20
> related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached=20
> to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more=20
> ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and=20
> rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the=20
> same issue? thanks
--=20
    Lawrence MacIntyre     865.574.8696     lpz@ornl.gov
               Oak Ridge National Laboratory
High Performance Information Infrastructure Technology Group


--=-jX/ixBOU2tlP47rnNhoX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/hBsSCNjP8rawCW4RAjBCAJ0YY475kAd2CG3Uhdhh1WxfEohxlACfbwTt
rMSRTHCMsY485UaW55zlgkw=
=8YzZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-jX/ixBOU2tlP47rnNhoX--